ToC Works

Section 8.3

An Influential Book with Different Canons

Creator: Jason Paul · Developed with AI by ToC Works.

First Enoch was read, used, and defended in early Christian settings. Tertullian's attention to it is one sign of that importance. Its influence cannot be measured simply by whether it appears in a later printed Bible.

Its canonical status also differs among traditions. The Ethiopian Orthodox tradition receives Enoch as Scripture. The Catholic Church does not. That difference should be stated plainly when the book's authority becomes part of an argument.

For this inquiry, Catholic noncanonicity establishes how Enoch will be used. It is a major witness to ancient interpretation and religious imagination. It can illuminate the setting of New Testament passages and the history of reading Genesis without becoming the standard by which the Catholic canon is revised.

The distinction allows us to avoid dismissing Enoch as unimportant or presenting it as a lost solution to every biblical difficulty. Its actual place in reception is more interesting than either of those shortcuts.

Sources

  1. The New American Bible - IntraText
  2. Tertullian: On the Pallium - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
  3. IV. The Canon Of Scripture
  4. Jude The Obscure: The Letter of Jude and The Enochic Heritage | The Journal of Theological Studies | Oxford Academic
  5. The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Return to this section in the contents ↑